Why Codex Should Be a Worker, Not the Scheduler
Explains why Codex and similar AI coding tools should remain bounded workers, not long-running schedulers or release controllers.
7 public items tagged github-issues.
Explains why Codex and similar AI coding tools should remain bounded workers, not long-running schedulers or release controllers.
Explains why AI pull requests should include reviewable evidence bundles, not just code changes and a claim that tests pass.
Shows how GitHub labels, branches, and comments can become an AI engineering state machine that keeps issue repair work observable and controllable.
Argues that an issue should be an executable contract for AI work, with scope, context, gates, evidence, and release boundaries instead of a loose todo.
Explains how to safely extract public methodology, templates, and toy examples from private production AI workflow experience.
Explains why a merged PR is not the end of AI engineering work; release verification, rollout checks, and post-merge evidence still define done.
Explains why AI repair work should move through triage, analysis, implementation, evidence, and review gates instead of jumping straight to code.