Bridge Trace: Why Execution Should Be Planned Before Calling SketchUp
Explains why SketchUp execution should be planned as a bridge trace before calling the Ruby bridge, so agent actions remain inspectable and repairable.
9 public items tagged mcp.
Explains why SketchUp execution should be planned as a bridge trace before calling the Ruby bridge, so agent actions remain inspectable and repairable.
Shows how an agent CLI, MCP server, SketchUp Ruby bridge, runtime skills, and a structured design model turn design intent into verifiable project state.
Explains why the SketchUp scene is an execution view while the structured design model is better for agent reasoning, validation, repair, and replay.
Explains why an agent harness needs headless smoke, live bridge checks, release smoke, and installed package verification.
Explains how the MCP server, execution trace, JSON-RPC, Ruby bridge, and feedback loop turn natural language into executable operations.
Explains why plan import should preserve source evidence and generate repairable working truth instead of promising perfect recognition.
Explains the product boundary between product runtime skills, project dynamic skills, and maintainer development skills.
Explains why a SketchUp agent needs a semantic component registry that exposes placement intent, constraints, and reuse rules instead of only searching 3D model assets.
Explains why Codex and Claude are entry points while the durable SAH core is the MCP server, project workspace, bridge trace, and SketchUp bridge.